Preventing
the Escalation of the Syria Conflict – Constitutional Complaint
Filed
(with the request for publication)
18.06.2017 | Unser Politikblog
 |
| (Volker Reusing,, Sarah Luzia Hassel-Reusing (plaintiff) and Wolfgang Effenberger (plaintiff) at the 17.03.2016 in front of the Constitutional Court) |
The
complaint wants to prevent the escalation of the Syria conflict to
thermonuclear war and to reach the prohibition of the circumvention,
by means of „humanitarian interventions“, of the prohibition of
aggressive war. In addition to that, it wants to put through, that
two biased judges move aside to achieve an orderly procedure.
The
escalation to thermonuclear war is currently impending particularly
by the one-sided illegal
no-fly zones / safety zone, which the USA are trying to establish
starting from the Syrian-Jordanian border town Al-Tanf. For that
purpose, the international alliance in the fight against Isis has, in
May and in June 2017, already made two airstrikes against the Syrian
army and its Shiite allies, which are progressing towards Al-Tanf.
The ad hoc alliance international alliance in the fight against Isis
has been created for the fight against Isis, not to attack the Syrian
army. And now the Bundeswehr even shall be relocated from the Turkish
Incirlik to Jordan. So the direct involvement of the Bundeswehr with
ground forces, with reconnaissance for airstrikes of the
international alliance in the fight against Isis, and by means of
joint staffs, into the escalation at Al-Tanf is impending.
Particularly, as the Iranian news agency Farsnews is worrying, if it
comes to a bigger invasion by USA, Great Britain, and Jordan at
Al-Tanf. The current American behaviour gives the impression not to
have been discussed with His Excellency, US President Donald Trump –
similarly to the attempt by general John Allen (CNAS and then
coordinator of the international alliance in the fight against Isis)
in July 2015 for a no-fly zone in the North of Syria.
The
papers by the think tanks CNAS („Defeating
the Islamic State – A Bottom-Up Approach“)
and Brookings Institution („Deconstructing
Syria – Towards a regionalized strategy for a confederal country“)
and the article „The Right Way to Create Safe Zones in Syria“ of
the 11.05.2017 in Foreign Affairs (the magazine of the think tank
CFR) are advertising (whilst downplaying the escalations risks) for
no-fly zones / safety zones directed to escalation. Also the
deescalation zones settled by Russia, Iran, and Turkey mean an
escalation risk, because it is unclear, in how far the other
countries involved in the Syria conflict will respect them.
 |
| (Volker Reusing and Gabriela Schimmer-Göresz (plaintiff)) |
Isis
and Al Qaida, which have received their Armageddon ideology from the
Muslim Brotherhood, are striving for the escalation of the Syria
conflict to world war, because they regard themselves as chosen to
provoke the final battle described in the Islamic Revelation, in
order to bring about this way until 2020 the global caliphate, which
also the Muslim Brotherhood is striving for. And it is completely
obscure, which State and / or private actors really command Isis and
Al Qaida. In addition to that, there are
significant publicly visible pieces of evidence signalling, that the
extortion networks (organized via human trafficking) of the
international „deep state“, with its branches into secret
services, into organized crime, into jihadism, into banks, and into
armageddon-believing and occult groups, are able, to pressure also
Western security policy deciders into the escalation of this
conflict. Furthermore, the escalation of the Syria conflict is
impending by attempts to split the country, and by the lacking
coordination of the countries, which are militarily involved in
Syria, with each other and particularly with the Syrian government.
The nuclear powers USA,
Russia, Great Britain, France, Israel, Saudi-Arabia, and China, are
involved in the conflict, with different interests and to different
extents. Also the joining of NATO
into the international alliance in the fight against Isis has
increased the escalation risks. Escalations risks originating from
Germany, are also deployment of German soldiers in the Kurdish areas
of Syria (which has been prohibited by the Syrian government) and the
two biased constitutional judges.
 |
| (Volker Reusing and Wolfgang Effenberger (plaintiff)) |
The constitutional complaint shows these escalation risks for the German Syria deployment.
The
Syria conflict has, already several times, nearly escalated, among
them the prevention just in time at the 31.08.2013
and the proposal by Saudi-Arabia in February 2016 (rejected by NATO)
to invade into Syria and Iraq with an international Sunni ad hoc
alliance.
And
the repeated airstrikes by the international alliance in the fight
against Isis against Syrian troops and Shiite troops allied with
them, which are progressing towards Al-Tanf, seem to be short before
escalation.
