Our
thankfulness goes to the constitutional judge Prof. Dr. Johannes
Masing, who had, in an article for the newspaper Sueddeutsche
Zeitung, called for a closer look for an thorough political and
public discussion on the draft EU privacy regulation - and to the
internet newspaper Linkszeitung, which has drawn our attention to his
article. We give grateful to the 16 US secret services including the
Central Intelligenge Agency, which have confirmed in 2011 their
assessment from 2007, that Iran does not have any nuclear weapons
program.We send our respect to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the religious
leader of Iran, for his confirmation, that any striving for nuclear
weapons would be a sin. We are grateful to US secret services
director James R.
Clapper Jr., to CIA director David H. Petraeus, and to US Minister of
Defence Leon E. Panetta, for their public statements, that there is
NO proof at all, that Iran would have any intention to build a
nuclear bomb Our
respect goes to His Excellency, Mahmud Ahmadinedschad, the President
of Iran, who has stated in 2011 towards the United Nations, that
nuclear bombs are the worst weapons against mankind, and that they
have to be completely abolished. Support confidence building and
peace between USA, Iran, Israel, and China. Stop the draft
pretending-to-be EU privacy regulation..Start legal investigations
against CFR and ECFR, to clarify, if these organizations endander the
world peace.
In a speech in
May 2010, US Vice President Joe Biden has, in a speech to the EU
Parliament, quoted in connection with the European loans to Greece
drawn a quotation from the poem „Easter, 1916“ of the occult
Irish poet William Butler Yates.
He quoted: „The
world has changed. Changed utterly. A terrible beauty has been born.“
I stand here in
Rue Wiertz, a few meters to the EU Parliament at Brussels. Behind me,
you see the statue of the „terrible beauty“, which symbolically
uses the euro to turn people into material.
Only a few days
respectively weeks after his speech, the banker's enrichment
mechanisms EFSM and EFSF have been launched.
It looks as if
Joe Biden was much more informed in this puzzle than Peace Nobel
Prize winner Barack Obama, but still much less informed than certain
think tanks.
At the
26.01.2012, a new draft EU regulation in the name of privacy has been
initiated on the EU level.This report shows its militarist background
and its dangers for the world peace. We want to express with perfect
clarity, that this is no intrige of any states at all, but of
globally acting unscrupu-lous think tanks and of a part of the
persons and of the media, which are embedded with these think tanks.
We want to express our respect to any nations and any countries, our
respect to China equally as to the USA, to Israel equally as to Iran.
We wish all politicians on this planet the power and the wisdom to
return to their consciousness and to leave the logic of these think
tanks, which have turned themselves against the world coummity and
against all nations of the world.
What think tanks are,
Think tanks
produce thoughts. They organize media coverage for thoughts, which
they have produced, and for persons, who are willing to implement
their thoughts. The media consumer often does not know, which
thoughts of seemingly independent politicians, scientists, or media
are in reality prepared in such think tanks. Think tanks follow the
principles: Thinking is creative, and our reason proves to itself,
what it is thinking. People, who are not conscious of their thoughts
and emotions, and whose awareness is concentrated to the world
outside themselves, are manipulatable by think tanks. If you are not
conscious enough, they can even make you adapt yourself to surreal
delusionary or deceptive pictures of the world – instead of
comparing such pictures to reality. Another concept is to spread
certain opinions over mass media, and then to look, which prominent
or influencial people have picked up these opinions, in order to
contact them.
and where their power comes from
The political
power of think tanks comes from three sources. One is money and
deserves a closer look, because some of the financiers of CFR and
ECFR might stop their financing, if they knew about CFR's current
deliberately risking a nuclear war. The second one are naive
prominent people, who give their names for these think tanks, thus
giving them a false aura of reputation, which is decisive for the
manipulation of unconscious media consumers and politicians. The
third one is their possibility to pay politicians with attention via
their embedded media. If politicians do what CFR or ECFR, and other
tanks, want them to do, they get coverage by some of the embedded
media and win some elections. Quite tricky, because this way you
won't find money from these think tanks on the banking accounts of
such politicians. We just do not know, if and how the media are
rewarded by such think tanks for their risky service. A closer look
regarding the shareholders of such media could deliver the answer to
this question.
Now, let us have
a closer look at the draft regulation.
